<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In &#8216;08 Election Who&#8217;s the Most Tech Friendly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.atomac.net/archived/in-08-election-whos-the-most-tech-friendly/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.atomac.net/archived/in-08-election-whos-the-most-tech-friendly</link>
	<description>...because the .com was taken.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:17:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Skunkie</title>
		<link>http://www.atomac.net/archived/in-08-election-whos-the-most-tech-friendly/comment-page-1#comment-773</link>
		<dc:creator>Skunkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 02:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atomac.net/2008/02/06/in-08-election-whos-the-most-tech-friendly/#comment-773</guid>
		<description>Teslanaut, Mitt?  Anywho, the asterisks are for notes that are in the original article I linked to with the image.  You should definitely read the article.

Sally, looks like Clinton is winning the most delegates right now, but Obama is coming in close behind her.  I am still uncertain who my official vote will go towards, but I suppose since I am unable to vote in any state&#039;s primaries I am gonna ahve to wait and see who wins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Teslanaut, Mitt?  Anywho, the asterisks are for notes that are in the original article I linked to with the image.  You should definitely read the article.</p>
<p>Sally, looks like Clinton is winning the most delegates right now, but Obama is coming in close behind her.  I am still uncertain who my official vote will go towards, but I suppose since I am unable to vote in any state&#8217;s primaries I am gonna ahve to wait and see who wins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teslanaut</title>
		<link>http://www.atomac.net/archived/in-08-election-whos-the-most-tech-friendly/comment-page-1#comment-775</link>
		<dc:creator>Teslanaut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atomac.net/2008/02/06/in-08-election-whos-the-most-tech-friendly/#comment-775</guid>
		<description>We should have two prezzies. Obama to take care of the people, Ron Paul to take care of the Internets.

And whats the * for on some of Mitt&#039;s replies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should have two prezzies. Obama to take care of the people, Ron Paul to take care of the Internets.</p>
<p>And whats the * for on some of Mitt&#8217;s replies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sallyforth</title>
		<link>http://www.atomac.net/archived/in-08-election-whos-the-most-tech-friendly/comment-page-1#comment-774</link>
		<dc:creator>sallyforth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 12:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atomac.net/2008/02/06/in-08-election-whos-the-most-tech-friendly/#comment-774</guid>
		<description>This clarifies things a lot for me.  At least Obama doesn&#039;t duck the questions the way Clinton and the Republicans often do.  Go Obama!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This clarifies things a lot for me.  At least Obama doesn&#8217;t duck the questions the way Clinton and the Republicans often do.  Go Obama!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
